Don DeBar's Blog

Revolutions are made when a LEADERSHIP evolves that knows how to unify the disparate and contradictory segments of the working and other (e.g., peasant) dispossessed classes in order to focus their power upon the common enemy and bring that revolution into being. The role is NOT to act as some self-appointed class of ideology instructors and priests to make sure all have the same line on every piece of the minutiae of human existence under the present order which is being challenged. The Russian Revolution is a perfect example. The war-weary victims of WW I demanded "Peace". The hungry in Russia demanded "Bread". The peasants living as serfs, in foreclosure/eviction, demanded "Land". Lenin and the Bolsheviks raised the cry of "Peace, Bread & Land" ("МИР, ЗЕМЛЯ И ХЛЕБ!") and presto ! It really isn't rocket science. The one's who need the proper ideology are those who would organize and then lead. That ideology must begin from...

Please see this before reading. I am trying to determine whether this is a giant error, or evidence of outright service to Langley or some other organ of the ruling class. It is incredible to me that a party aiming to be the vanguard of the working class can continuously side with the class enemy against actual workers. The people I know in PSL seem honest and intelligent but there is a continuous reference to the definition of terms offered by the ruling class on just about every question that preoccupies actual workers in the US. This is just the latest. Brexit was a right wing phenomenon. Trump supporters were fascist dupes. January 6 was a flareup of white supremacy. Now the truckers who are in rebellion against mandates - and a host of other concerns dealing with their material conditions, BTW - are supporters of a "reactionary movement" and should be opposed. When the leadership of a vanguard party that would lead the working class to its liberation finds itself on the...

I am banned "for 24 hours" from Facebook over something I sent to a real life friend via PM - a PRIVATE message - for "violating community standards" IN A PRIVATE TEXT TO A IRL FRIEND!!! We were discussing the similarities between Barbarossa in 1941, and the NATO enlargements, the attempted color revolutions in Belarus and Kazakhstan and the coup in Ukraine today. I wrote that what Dolfo had long planned for the Soviet Union was well-known to Churchill, FDR and Stalin long before, since he laid it out in that book he wrote in jail (afraid to name it here) which was published in the mid-1920s. The behavior of the US, France and the UK prior to the signing of the 1939 Soviet non-aggression pact with Germany cannot be properly understood without facing that fact as context. With this discussion, I sent my friend an English-language translation copy of that book (although she speaks German as well as English, I speak only English, and that, not well) and I referred h...

I am banned "for 24 hours" from Facebook over something I sent to a real life friend via PM - a PRIVATE message - for "violating community standards" IN A PRIVATE TEXT TO A IRL FRIEND!!! We were discussing the similarities between Barbarossa in 1941, and the NATO enlargements, the attempted color revolutions in Belarus and Kazakhstan and the coup in Ukraine today. I wrote that what Dolfo had long planned for the Soviet Union was well-known to Churchill, FDR and Stalin long before, since he laid it out in that book he wrote in jail (afraid to name it here) which was published in the mid-1920s. The behavior of the US, France and the UK prior to the signing of the 1939 Soviet non-aggression pact with Germany cannot be properly understood without facing that fact as context. With this discussion, I sent my friend an English-language translation copy of that book (although she speaks German as well as English, I speak only English, and that, not well) and I referred h...

From https://www.state.gov/russias-top-five-persistent-disinformation-narratives/ as of 5:32 pm EST, January 26, 2022 "Russia’s Top Five Persistent Disinformation Narratives "FACT SHEET "OFFICE OF THE SPOKESPERSON JANUARY 20, 2022 "Over many years, Russia has fabricated a set of false narratives that its disinformation and propaganda ecosystem persistently injects into the global information environment. These narratives act like a template, which enables the Kremlin to adjust these narratives, with one consistency – a complete disregard for truth as it shapes the information environment to support its policy goals. "Russian military and intelligence entities are engaging in this activity across Russia’s disinformation and propaganda ecosystem, to include malign social media operations, the use of overt and covert online proxy media outlets, the injection of disinformation into television and radio programming, the hosting of conferences designed to i...

17 December 2021 13:26 Agreement on measures to ensure the security of The Russian Federation and member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization The Russian Federation and the member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), hereinafter referred to as the Parties, reaffirming their aspiration to improve relations and deepen mutual understanding, acknowledging that an effective response to contemporary challenges and threats to security in our interdependent world requires joint efforts of all the Parties, determined to prevent dangerous military activity and therefore reduce the possibility of incidents between their armed forces, noting that the security interests of each Party require better multilateral cooperation, more political and military stability, predictability, and transparency, reaffirming their commitment to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, the 1975 Helsinki Final Act of the Conference on Security and Co-oper...

Sent to Foreign Policy this morning in reply to the below-linked article. "What does Putin actually want?" Could it be that "FP’s team of reporters and experts" are actually deaf, blind and fucking stupid? Russia's entire government, despite Langley's attempt to fragment the response to the US meddling on the borders in Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan and the deployment of troops and assets around the borders, throughout the former Warsaw Pact buffer states and former Soviet republics, has been the saying the same thing - back the fuck off. If Russia and/or China - or even the EU - were to deploy military resources in Canada and/or Mexico, would you ask "What does Biden's teleprompter actually want"? This doesn't even take into consideration the US response to the suggestion that Russia might place some military resources - at the invitation of the host countries, BTW, without the need for a coup - in Cuba and/or Venezuela (and, presumab...